TRACKS FOR CHANGE, FLEXIBILITY, INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND CREATIVITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION

TRACKS FOR CHANGE, FLEXIBILITY, INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND CREATIVITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION

M. Enelund, K. Briggs (2020).  TRACKS FOR CHANGE, FLEXIBILITY, INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND CREATIVITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION. Volume 1, pp.37-47.

This paper describes the early stages of the developments of Tracks, an initiative to create, implement and evaluate a new educational model where the structure of the education is developed to give students the opportunity to create multi- and interdisciplinary competencies, meet their expectations and need for a more individualized study plan and shorten the lead times for changing the education to embrace new technologies. The new education model is based on the creation of tracks with different themes lying between existing programs not belonging to a specific department or school. The idea is to create individual and flexible study opportunities by introducing Track-courses within the themes. These courses address specific challenges that may be broad societal and profound research-driven. Tracks also include large investments in Chalmers’ learning environment. The paper focuses on Tracks as a large change initiative, strategies to manage the complexity of this change as well as development philosophy and working methods in the early phases of the initiative.  Change at universities has been discussed previously, but this is a unique opportunity to study how large change may be managed over time, including both the content of the education and the learning environments. Through action research, where interventions may be done to influence the initiative, it is possible to develop practical contributions for other universities in need of similar development. The research has been conducted over approximately a year and includes data from interviews and action research, where the authors are the main people working with this initiative. The close contact with the data gives a unique understanding of how different activities within the initiative influence the outcome. Thus, this paper will contribute to the understanding of how large institutional change initiatives are facilitated by a flexible and agile approach contrasting the traditional and somewhat slower university culture.

Authors (New): 
Mikael Enelund
Kristina Henricson Briggs
Pages: 
Volume 1, pp.37-47
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
educational change
Multidisciplinary
agile
flexibility
educational management
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Alpay, E., Jones, M.E. (2012). Engineering education in research-intensive universities. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 37:6, pp. 609-626.: 
Audunsson, H., Fridgeirsson, T., Saemundsdottir, I. (2018). Challenging engineering students with uncertainty in a VUCA situation. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference (pp. 9) Kanazawa, Japan: Kanazawa Institute of Technology.: 
CDIO Standard 2.1. (2020, April 17). Retrieved from CDIO Standard 2.1: http://www.cdio.org/content/cdio-standard-21: 
Cheah, S., Leong, H. (2018). Relevance of CDIO Industry 4.0 – proposal for 2 new standards. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference (pp. 17) Kanazawa, Japan: Kanazawa Institute of Technology.: 
Coghlan, D., Brannick, T. (2019). Doing action research in your own organization, SAGE Publications Limited.: 
Crawley, E.F., Hosoi, A., Mitra, A. (2018). Redesigning Undergraduate Engineering Education at MIT – the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. ASEE National Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA: 
Enelund, M., Knutson Wedel, M., Lundqvist, U., & Malmqvist, J. (2013) Integration of Education for Sustainable Development in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19:1, pp. 51-62: 
10.7158/22054952.2013.11464078
Graham, R. (2018). The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education, Technical Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.: 
Hallenga-Brink, S., Kok, O. (2016). Implementing CDIO in Twelve Programs Simultaneously: Change Management. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference (pp 13). Turku, Finland.: 
Hallenga-Brink, S., Sjoer, E. (2017). Designing a Flexible, Choice-Based, Integrated, Professionally Challenging, Multidisciplinary Curriculum. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference (pp 16). Calgary, Canada.: 
Kamp, A. (2019). Science & technology education for 21st century Europe. Discussion Paper Leuven. : 
10.5281/zenodo.3582544
Kohn Rådberg, K.,Lundqvist, U.,Malmqvist, M.Hagvall Svensson, O. (2018) From CDIO to challenge-based learning experiences – expanding student learning as well as societal impact? European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 43 pp. 1-16.: 
Malmqvist, J., Bankel, J., Enelund, M., Gustafsson, G., & Knutson Wedel, M. (2010) Ten Years of CDIO – Experiences from a Long-Term Education Development Process, Proceedings of 6th International CDIO Conference (pp 27). École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada.: 
Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union. A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/mazzucato_report_2018.pdf: 
Rouvrais, S, Landrac, G. (2012). Resistance To Change In Institutionalizing The CDIO Standards: From A Cascade To An Agile Improvement Model. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference (pp. 13 ) Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.: 
Snow Andrade, M. (2018). A Responsive Higher Education Curriculum: Change and Disruptive Innovation. IntechOpen: 
10.5772/intechopen.80443
Truong, T., Le, B. (2019) The effects of Industry 4.0 on teaching and learning CDIO project at Duy Tan University. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference (pp. 15) Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.: 
Go to top
randomness