VIDEO DEVELOPMENT METHODS FOR CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES

P. Papadopoulou, K. Bhadani, C. Stöhr, E. Hulthén, M. Evertsson, J. Malmqvist (2018). VIDEO DEVELOPMENT METHODS FOR CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES. 11.

2018 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa IT, Japan

58_Final_PDF.pdf

Video utilization can be a powerful tool for teachers to stimulate students’ interest and support flexible and adaptive learning. Successful video-based learning implementation cannot be assured without careful consideration regarding desired quality, learning outcomes and video development methods. The investigation and sharing of experiences considering video development is indispensable and will contribute to spreading a culture of easily made, peerreviewed videos, which will enhance teaching and learning. For CDIO-based courses, it is required that the video development methods are agile and cost-effective in production as to support continuous update of videos relevant for the course and other course activities. In this paper, we identify and describe video development methods from different CDIO-based project courses. The methods are classified based on the content type, the production style, the required resources and the video characteristics. All presented video development methods follow our general framework of video development process which has been previously published and consists of four interwoven steps - topic selection, learning objectives mapping, content generation and video recording. Based on semi-structured interviews with the course teachers, we present their experiences with those different development methods to create content specific videos pertaining to various Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate topics. As outcome, we suggest our preferable video development method depending on video content category. We conclude that the choice of video development method must consider the audience’s characteristics and needs while video content should be aligned with the course content, other learning activities and the literature. The video development methods suggested and described in this paper will assist educators to choose an appropriate video development method for their own courses and maximize the videos’ contribution to student learning.

Authors (New):

Panagiota Papadopoulou

Kanishk Bhadani

Christian Stöhr

Erik Hulthén

Magnus Evertsson

Johan Malmqvist

Pages:

Affiliations:

Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

Keywords:

Video-based learning (VBL)

Design-build-test project

Project based learning

CDIO Standard 2

CDIO Standard 5

CDIO Standard 8

CDIO Standard 10

Year:

2018

Reference:

Basu Roy, R., & McMahon, G. T. (2012). Video-based cases disrupt deep critical thinking in problembased learning. Medical Education, 46(4), 426-435. :

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04197.x

Bhadani, K., Stöhr, C., Hulthén, E., Quist, J., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M., & Malmqvist, J. (2017). Student perspectives on video-based learning in CDIO-based project courses. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary. :

Blummer, B. A., & Kritskaya, O. (2009). Best practices for creating an online tutorial: A literature review. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 199-216.:

https://doi.org/10.1080/19322900903050799

Cheah, S. M., Lee, H. B., & Sale, D. (2016). Flipping a chemical engineering module using an evidencebased teaching approach. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference. Turku, Finland: Turku Univeristy of Applied Sciences.:

Giannakos, M. N. (2013). Exploring the video-based learning research: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 191-195. :

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12070

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, 41- 50. :

https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12 (Supplement C), 45-58. :

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001

Hugo, R. J. (2014). From the printing press to You Tube- Welcome to the world of lecture 2.0. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Barcelona, Spain:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.:

Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2017). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology. :

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548

Kay, R., & Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers & Education, 59(2), 619-627. :

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.007

Koumi, J. (2013). Pedagogic design guidelines for multimedia materials: A call for collaboration between practitioners and researchers. Journal of Visual Literacy, 32(2), 85-114. :

https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2013.11674711

Martin, N. A., & Martin, R. (2015). Would you watch it? Creating effective and engaging video tutorials. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1-2), 40-56. :

https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.946345

Mayer, R. E. (2007). Research-based guidelines for multimedia instruction. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3(1), 127-147. :

https://doi.org/10.1518/155723408X299861

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies,Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.:

Mestre, L. S. (2012). Student preference for tutorial design: a usability study. Reference Services Review, 40(2), 258-276. :

https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211228318

Nikopoulou-Smyrni, P., & Nikopoulos, C. (2010). Evaluating the impact of video-based versus traditional lectures on student learning. Educational Research, 1(8), 304-311.:

Oud, J. (2009). Guidelines for effective online instruction using multimedia screencasts. Reference Services Review, 37(2), 164-177. :

https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320910957206

Plaisant, C., & Shneiderman, B. (2005). Show Me! Guidelines for producing recorded demonstrations. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'05), 171-178. :

https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2005.57

Sellens, R. (2014). Video microlectures: Simple to make; valued by students. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.:

Svensson, L., Hammarstrand, L., & Stöhr, C. (2015). Flipping a PhD course using movies from a MOOC. Proceedings of 5:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar (pp. 168-171). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Universitet.:

van der Mei, H., & van der Meij, J. (2013). Eight guidelines for the design of instructional videos for software training. Technical communication, 60(3), 205-228. :

van der Meij, H. (2017). Reviews in instructional video. Computers & Education, 114 (Supplement C), 164-174. :

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.002

Viksilä, R. (2013). Effectiveness of video lecturing in ICT learning. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.:

on January 21, 2019 - 17:16 Tyrone Machado

VIDEO DEVELOPMENT METHODS FOR CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES

Navigation

VIDEO DEVELOPMENT METHODS FOR CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES

Share this content.