SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF A FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS MODULE

SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF A FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS MODULE

C. McCartan, J. Hermon (2008).  SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF A FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS MODULE. 12.

Teaching tertiary mathematics to engineers is a worldwide issue. This paper discusses a systematic and structured approach to developing a first year engineering mathematics module based on the best current pedagogical practices, innovations and resources. All relevant didactic aspects are covered. The guiding paradigm is active learning both in class and out of class. A development plan is presented and the progress of the module, which is now in its second year, is discussed. Designing and implementing a successful module included: fully understanding the potential student learning problems; researching and applying the best practices in teaching tertiary mathematics; utilising the available resources.

Authors (New): 
Charles McCartan
John Paul Hermon
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
Engineering Mathematics
declining mathematical skills
Active learning
Motivation
content
learning
Assessment
teaching
Year: 
2008
Reference: 
Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D.R., Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach. Springer.: 
ISBN 978-0-387-38287-6, 2007
London Mathematical Society, “Tackling the Mathematics Problem”, London 1995. : 
Engineering Council UK, “Measuring the Mathematics Problem”, a report published by the ECUK in June 2000, accessed from their website on 13/04/2008: http://www.engc.org.uk/documents/Measuring_the_Maths_Problems.pdf: 
Lawson D. A., “What can we expect of ‘A’ level mathematics students?”, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, Vol.16 (4) 1997, pp 151 – 156. : 
Roberts G., “SET for success: the supply of people with science, engineering, technology and mathematics skills”, the report of Sir Gareth Roberts' review, HM Treasury, April 2002. Website accessed 14/04/2008: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/F/8/robertsreview_introch1.pdf : 
Smith A., “Making Mathematics Count, the report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education”, Department for Education and Skills (DfES) for England, February 2004. Website accessed 14/04/2008: http://www.mathsinquiry.org.uk/report/MathsInquiryFinalReport.pdf : 
de Guzman M., Hodgson B., Robert A. and Vialli, V., “Difficulties in the Passage from Secondary to Tertiary Education”, Proc Internat Congress of Math Berlin 1998, Vol III, pp 747-762. Extra vol. ICM 1998, Documenta Mathematica. : 
Jevick J. and Koukal S., “Role of Mathematics in Engineering Education”, in Teaching Mathematics, 25th Conference on Mathematics in Technical, Economic and Agricultural universities, Trnava, Slovak Republic 1998, pp. 26-29. : 
Pavloviová G., (2000), “Some problems with the adaptability of students in the first year at university”, Proceedings of a seminar The Role and Position of Mathematics among other Scientific Disciplines, Nitra, Slovak Republic, pp. 18-20. : 
SEFI, “Mathematics for the European Engineer, a Curriculum for the Twenty - First Century”, A report by the SEFI Mathematics Working Group. Edited by Leslie Mustoe and Duncan Lawson, March 2002. ISBN 2-87352-045-0. Link accessed 14/04/2008: https://learn.lboro.ac.uk/mwg/core/latest/sefimarch2002.pdf: 
Seldon A., “New developments and trends in tertiary mathematics education: Or, more of the same?” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 36, Nos. 2–3, 2005, 131–147. : 
Race P., The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A Resource for developing Learning, Teaching and Assessment, Second Edition 2002, Routledge (UK). : 
Chickering A.W. and Gamson Z.F., “Seven Principles for Good Practice”, AAHE Bulletin 39: 3-7. ED 282 491. 6 pp. MF-01; PC-01, 1987. : 
Penner J.G., Why Many College Teachers Cannot Lecture. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas 1984.: 
Ruhl K.L., Hughes C.A., and Schloss P.J., “Using the Pause Procedure to Enhance Lecture Recall”, Teacher Education and Special Education 10: 14-18, 1987. : 
Kolb David A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New York: Prentice-Hall 1984. : 
Otung I.E., “Reassessing the mathematics content of engineering education”, Engineering Science and Education Journal, August 2001. : 
Mustoe, L., “The mathematics background of undergraduate engineers”. Proc. Progress 1 Conf. on Student Progression and Retention in Engng., Hull, England, UK, 88-95 (2001). : 
LTSN (1), “ Maths for Engineering and Science”, a document published by the Learning and Teaching Support Network in 2001, accessed from their website on 14/04/2008, http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/mathsteam/engineering_science.pdf: 
LTSN (2), “Maths Support for Students”, a document published by the Learning and Teaching Support Network in 2001, accessed from their website on 14/04/2008, http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/mathsteam/student_support.pdf: 
LTSN (3) “Diagnostic Testing for Mathematics”, a document published by the Learning and Teaching Support Network in 2001, accessed from their website on 14/04/2008, http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/mathsteam/diagnostic_test.pdf: 
Kajander A. and Lovric M., “Transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics: McMaster University experience”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 36, Nos. 2–3, 2005, 149–160: 
Felder R.M. and Silverman L.K., “Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education”. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674-681, 1988. The author added an important Preface to this paper in 2002 which can be accessed on the web link (accessed 15/04/2008): http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/LS1988.pdf: 
Orhun N., “An investigation into the mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics with respect to learning style according to gender”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 38, No. 3, 15 April 2007, 321–333 : 
Hermon J.P., “The Use of Learning Styles as a Tool for Curriculum and Personal Development”, Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 11-14, 2007: 
Willcox K. and Bounova G., “Mathematics in Engineering: Identifying, Enhancing and Linking the Implicit Mathematics Curriculum”, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education. : 
Bamforth S., Crawford A., Croft A. and Robinson C., “A pre-sessional course: retaining engineering students through mathematical and transferable skills support”, International journal of electrical engineering education, 42(1), 79-87, 2005. : 
Cox W., “What Sort of Pedagogic Theory Do We Need for Teaching Mathematics in higher Education”, MSOR Connections vol.6, no.4, 2007. : 
Cox W., “A MATHKIT for engineers”, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 22, 4, 16, 2003. : 
Gibbs G. and Simpson C., “Does your assessment support your students' learning?”, Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 1, 2003. : 
Rust C., “The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning: How Can the Research Literature Practically Help to Inform the Development of Departmental Assessment Strategies and Learner-Centred Assessment Practices?”, Active Learning in Higher Education 2002; 3; 145, The Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education and SAGE Publications : 
Biggs J., “Teaching for Quality Learning at University”, Buckingham: SRHE/OUP, 1999.: 
Gokhale A.A., “Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking”, Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 7 No. 1, Fall 1995. : 
Oates G., Paterson J., Reilly I. and Statham M., “Effective tutorial programmes in tertiary mathematics”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36:7, 731 – 739, 2005. : 
Prince M., “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research”, Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93(3), 223-231. : 
EPC, “Assessment Methods in Engineering Degree Courses”, Engineering Professors’ Council (EPC) Occasional Papers. Website accessed 17/04/2008: www.epc.ac.uk/publications/papers/index.php .: 
Davis, L. E., Harrison, M. C., Palipana, A. S. and Ward, J. P., “Assessment-driven learning of mathematics for engineering students”, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education Volume 42 Issue 1, January 2005, pp 63-72: 
Urbina A.M., León de la Barra M.B. and León de la Barra G.E., “A Remedial Program for First Year Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 'Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education ', 1999. Volume 1, page(s):11A7/1 – 11A7/4.: 
León de la Barra, M.B., León de la Barra, G.E., Urbina, A.M. and León de la Barra, B.A. (1996), ‘Short Period Teaching-Learning Styles’, Proceedings of the 26th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Volume 1, page(s):452 – 454. : 
León de la Barra M.B., León de la Barra G.E., Urbina A.M. and León de la Barra B.A., “Continuous Improvement of Engineering-Maths Teaching”, Education Conference, 'Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change', 1997. Volume 3, page(s):1290 – 1293.: 
León de la Barra M.B., León de la Barra G.E., Urbina A.M. and León de la Barra B.A., “Towards a Global Improvement of Engineering-Maths Teaching”, Proceedings of the 27th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, ' Moving from "Teacher-Centered" to "Learner-Centered" Education', 1998. Volume 3, page(s):1327 – 1331. : 
Go to top