STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTERDISCIPLINARITY – FINDINGS FROM AN INTERDISCIPLINARY TWO-YEAR MASTER PROGRAM

STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTERDISCIPLINARITY – FINDINGS FROM AN INTERDISCIPLINARY TWO-YEAR MASTER PROGRAM

The business environment has changed significantly during the last decade; globalization and short innovation cycles have become every-day business. These changes have formed new conditions for the companies and organizations: few of the problems encountered can be answered within a single discipline. Hence in order to address contemporary problems, companies and organizations need to have labor and recruit students with interdisciplinary skills. Consequently higher education must correspond to the business world’s changing needs by providing interdisciplinary programs. The purpose of possessing interdisciplinary knowledge and skills is to have the ability to understand the origin and nature of related disciplines as well as to relate these to its own discipline. Interdisciplinary skills could be viewed as an intangible type of knowledge that needs to be taught by and learned at the university. By possessing interdisciplinary skills, the labor and students will have a holistic view as compared the view related to one single discipline. The challenge, for the universities, lies in teaching and to ensure that the students possess interdisciplinary knowledge and skills. This paper focuses on students’ perceptions of interdisciplinarity and where it is taught and learned in a two-year master program. The purpose is to identify and analyze students’ perceptions of learning interdisciplinarity in a two-year master program. This paper is based on focus groups and personal interviews with students enrolled in the interdisciplinary two-year master program named “Innovation through business, engineering and design” hosted by the Linnaeus University. The two-year master program aims to enroll about 30 students each year from the disciplinary areas of Business, Engineering and Design. The paper concludes that the students perceive interdisciplinary as challenging and that interdisciplinarity require disciplinary skills and competences as well as personal and interpersonal capabilities. The students’ perceptions of interdisciplinary learning appear to be in line with the notion that learning is primarily to see things from different perspectives. Interdisciplinarity appears first and foremost in team work and communication. Tendencies towards a modification of the disciplines were noticed by the authors, which might lead to new disciplines evolving, such as “innovation design” or “innovation engineering”. 

Authors (New): 
Mirka Kans
Åsa Gustafsson
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Linnaeus University, Sweden
Keywords: 
Interdisciplinarity
Interview study
Ongoing two-year master program in innovation
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Annan-Diab, F. & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 73-83.: 
Bailey, C. A. (2006). A guide to qualitative field research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publication ltd.: 
Bajada, C. & Trayler, R. (2013). Interdisciplinary business education: curriculum through collaboration. Education + Training, 55(4/5), 385-402.: 
Brassler, M. & Dettmer, J. (2017). How to Enhance Interdisciplinary competence—Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Learning versus Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 11(2), 15-30.: 
Boehm, B. & Mobasser, S. K. (2015). System Thinking: Educating T-Shaped Software Engineers. Proceedings of the IEEE 28th conference on Software Engineering Education and Thinking, 13-16.: 
Bolman, L.G. & Deal, T.E. (2014). Nya perspektiv på organisation och ledarskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.: 
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A., & Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20-23.: 
Davies, M. & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education: Implications for teaching and learning. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, the University of Melbourne. [Electronic document], http://cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/curriculum_design/docs/InterdisciplinaryHEd.pdf. : 
Davies, M. & Devlin, M. (2010). Interdisciplinary higher education in Tight, M., Devlin, M., & Davies, W. M. (2010). Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Perspectives and Practicalities. Bingley, UK: Emerald Book Serials and Monographs, 3-28.: 
Eklund, K. (2017). Vår ekonomi : en introduktion till samhällsekonomin. Studentlitteratur, Sweden.: 
Elmquist, L., Eriksson, L. & Ekman, F. (2014). Workshop at a company with students from two different disciplines. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16-19, 2014.: 
Geschwind, L., & Melin, G. (2015). Stronger disciplinary identities in multidisciplinary research schools. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(1), 16-28.: 
Giorgi, A. (1986). A phenomenological analysis of descriptions of concepts of learning obtained from a phenomenographic perspective. Inst. För pedagogik, GU, 8.: 
Harris, P. (2009). Help Wanted: ”T-Shaped” Skills to Meet 21st Century Needs. T + D September 2009, 42-47.: 
Swedish Higher Education Authority (UKÄ). http://www.uka.se/fakta-om-hogskolan/universitet-ochhogskolor.html, 2017-10-24.: 
Kanda, W., Sakao, T., & Hjelm, O. (2016). Components of business concepts for the diffusion of large scaled environmental technology systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 156-167.: 
Kans, M. & Gustavsson, Å. (2016). Analyzing the meaning of interdisciplinary in the CDIO context. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016.: 
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. CA: Sage publications Inc.: 
Martin, J. & Wackerlin, D. (2016). CDIO as a Cross-Discipline Academic Model, Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016.: 
Marton, F. & Booth, S. (2000). Om lärande. Studentlitteratur, Sweden: 
Marton, F., Beaty, E., & Dall’Alba, G. (1993). Conceptions of Learning. International Journal of Educational research, 19, 277-300.: 
Meeth R. (1978). Interdisciplinary Studies: A Matter of Definition. Change 10(7), 10: 
Miles M B. & Huberman, A M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). CA: Sage Thousand Oaks. : 
Sanschez, C. A., Ruddell, B. J., Sceisser, R. & Merwande, V. (2016). Enhancing the T-shaped learning profile when teaching hydrology using data, modeling, and visualization activities. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20, 1289-1299.: 
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. CA: Sage publications Inc: 
Strandberg, L (2006). Vygotskij I praktiken – Bland plugghästar och fusklappar. Norstedts. Sweden.: 
Säljö, R. (1982). Learning and understanding: A study of differences in constructing meaning from a text. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.: 
Vanstone M., Hibbert K., Kinsella, E. A., McKenzie, P. J., Pitman, A., & Lingard, L. (2013). Interdisciplinary doctoral research supervision: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(2), 42-67.: 
Go to top
randomness