STUDENT´S JOURNEY AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT IN AN ENGINEERING PROGRAM

STUDENT´S JOURNEY AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT IN AN ENGINEERING PROGRAM

Student’s journey through the engineering educational program is academically demanding, and along the way, the student is required to develop professional interpersonal skills. To promote student‘s positive journey, the engineering program at Reykjavik University (RU) implemented an intense two-day event called Disaster Days, normally occurring in the fourth or fifth week into the first semester. In this event, students are challenged with a simulated disastrous situation where they have to face a sudden complex event that must be tackled in a single day. In this study, we used semi-structured interviews to ascertain to what extent the event affected the student´s journey through the engineering program. Emerging clearly from these interviews with 15 students is that the students like this brief shift from the traditional individualistic learning environment, they value being confronted with group work with new people and that the event opens doors for a lasting social network. In particular, this experiential learning event has proved fruitful for developing the student’s appreciation for group work. These interviews show that we can confidently conclude that this immersive short event provides a good start for the student’s journey throughout the engineering program at RU and is arguably an important part of the curriculum to enhance interpersonal skills.

Authors (New): 
Haraldur Audunsson
Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson
Ásrún Matthíasdóttir
Pages: 
Volume 1, pp.325-333
Affiliations: 
Reykjavik University, Iceland
Keywords: 
student's journey
Experiential Learning
interpersonal skills
group work
Integrated Learning
student's well-being
networking
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Audunsson, H., Fridgeirsson, T. V. & Saemundsdottir, I. (2018). Challenging Engineering Students With Uncertainty in a VUCA Situation. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan.: 
Baker, D., Krause, S., Yasar, S., Roberts, C., & Robinson-Kurpius, S. (2007). An intervention to address gender issues in a course on design, engineering, and technology for science educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (3): 213–227.: 
Balakrishnan, B., & Low, F.S. (2016). Learning Experience and Socio-Cultural Influences on Female Engineering Students’ Perspectives on Engineering Courses and Careers. Minerva, 54, 219–239. : 
doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9295-8
Bergman, B., Norman, A, Carlsson, C., Nåfors D. & Skoogh, A. (2017). Forming effective culturally diverse work teams in project courses. In Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, Canada, June 18-22.: 
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., and Beddoes, K. (2013). Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102 (4): 472-512.: 
CDIO (2019). Standard 1 and 2. Retrieved 29.01.2020 from http://www.cdio.org/implementing-cdio/standards/12-cdio-standards.: 
Dewey, J., (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta PI Lecture Series. Collier-Macmillan Books 1963, London. ISBN 10: 0020136609.: 
Duhigg, C. (2016). What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team. The New York Times, Feb. 25. New York.: 
Elkington, R., van der Steege, M. & Moss Breen, J. (2017). Visionary Leadership in a Turbulent World: Thriving in the New VUCA Context. Emerald Publishing Limited, UK. ISBN-13: 978-1787142435.: 
Gaultier Le Bris, S., Rouvrais, S., Fridgeirsson, T. V., Tudela Villalonga, L. and Waldeck, R. (2017). Decision Making Skills in Engineering Education. SEFI 2017: 45th Conference on Education Excellence For Sustainable Development, Sep., Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal.: 
Kavanagh, M., Clark-Murphy, M. & Wood, L (2011). The First Class: Using Icebreakers to Facilitate Transition in a Tertiary Environment. Ocean Social Science, 7 (4).: 
Lavy, S. (2017). Who benefits from group work in higher education? An attachment theory perspective. Higher Education, 73, 175–187. : 
10.1007/s10734-016-0006-z
Lingard, R. & Barkataki, S. (2011). Teaching Teamwork in Engineering and Computer Science Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference. : 
10.1109/FIE.2011.6143000
Murphy, M. L., Bullough, T. J., Johnson, M. W., Millard, S. G., Shenton, A. T. & Sutcliffe, C. J. (2006). The Value of Immersive learning Experiences Within an ‘Introduction to Engineering’ module. In Proceeding of the 2nd International CDIO Conference, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.: 
OECD (2015), How’s Life? 2015: Measuring Well-being, OECD Publishing, Paris, : 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/how_life-2015-en
Saemundsdottir, I., Matthiasdottir, A., Audunsson, H., & Sævarsdottir, G. (2012). Facing Disaster - Learning by doing at Reykjavik University. In Proceedings at the 8th International CDIO 2012 Conference, Brisbane, Australia.: 
Wilson, K. (2009). Success in First Year: The impact of institutional, programmatic and personal interventions on an effective and sustainable first-year student experience. Paper presented at the 12th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, Townsville, Australia, June 29 – July 1.: 
Go to top