A NEW ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING CONCEPT FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

A NEW ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING CONCEPT FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

R. Loendersloot, A. Martinetti (2019).  A NEW ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING CONCEPT FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. 12.

Engineering is a broad multidisciplinary discipline, also reflected in the increase of the variety of students in a single academic course in terms of foreknowledge and of interests and skills. Adaptive learning is a powerful tool to achieve tailored education in a multidisciplinary learning environment. Students with a diverse background and even with different levels can work together in a similar learning environment. Without the support of e-learning concepts and online tools, this method is however very time consuming and ineffective for the lecturer. E-learning modules are typically passive, not directly guiding the students. The new concept presented here, actively helps the student to develop their own learning route, based on their needs and interest, yet meeting the course's learning objectives. The overall concept is based on a plenary core set of lectures embedded in a flexible shell of adaptive e-learning modules. These modules are cross-linked allowing the student to step from one topic branch to another, depending on the need or interest identified by a brief end-of-module assessment and earlier information collected by the system. A basic version of the web-based application to guide students through the network of elearning modules is tested and showed positive results in terms of student appreciation yet not directly in terms of performance. The latter is the most relevant from a didactic point of view, while the success of the concept heavily relies on positive student appreciation. The outcome of these first test used as input for the development of the final application. 

Authors (New): 
Richard Loendersloot
Alberto Martinetti
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
University of Twente, Netherlands
Keywords: 
Adaptive Learning
Multidisciplinary
Blended Learning
Engineering
Web-based tool
ICT
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2019
Reference: 
Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2017). Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter? Internet and Higher Education, 32, 29–38. : 
10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.002
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature re. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18.: 
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer learning in higher Education: Learning from & with each other. Psychology Press, 2001.: 
Cloutier, G., Hugo, R., Sellens, R. (2011). Mapping the relationship between the cdio syllabus and the ceab graduate attributes: an update. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 - 23, 2011: 
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. : 
10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333–2351.: 
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74–85. : 
10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Kamardeen, I. (2014). Adaptive e-Tutorial for Enhancing Student Learning in Construction Education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(2), 79–95.: 
10.1080/15578771.2012.756437
Marković, S., Jovanović, Z., Jovanović, N., Jevremović, A., & Popović, R. (2013). Adaptive distance learning and testing system. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21(S1), E2–E13. : 
10.1002/cae.20510
Padhi, A., Rajasekhara Babu, M., Jha, B., & Joshi, S. (2019). An IoT Model to Improve Cognitive Skills of Student Learning Experience Using Neurosensors. In Internet of Things and Personal Healthcare Systems (SpringerBr). Springer Singapore.: 
Richmond, E. (2014). Student-Centered Learning. Retrieved January 27, 2019, from https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/news/articles/1193: 
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 13.: 
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70. : 
10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.: 
Go to top
randomness