LESSONS LEARNED FROM STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEYS OF CDIO PROJECT COURSES

J. Malmqvist, L. Almefelt, M. Bingerud, M. Enelund (2018). LESSONS LEARNED FROM STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEYS OF CDIO PROJECT COURSES. 17.

2018 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa IT, Japan

155_Final_PDF.pdf

The paper reports on a study of student satisfaction in CDIO project courses. The aims are to investigate if there are statistically significant differences in levels and variation of student satisfaction metrics between CDIO project courses and “traditional” courses, and to identify possible causes for these differences. The study was carried out at Chalmers University of Technology and focused on courses in its mechanical, automation and industrial design engineering programs. In these programs, about 20 CDIO project courses and 235 traditional courses are offered each year. In the study, student satisfaction and some other quantified metrics collected from Chalmers’ course evaluation system are compared for the two groups of courses. Further, the paper examines in more detail selected CDIO project courses, with high and low student satisfaction ratings. The results of the study provide support for the hypothesis that there are significant differences in ratings. A number of causes are identified and discussed, including course leadership, perceived workload, assessment, and freedom to select task.

Authors (New):

Johan Malmqvist

Lars Almefelt

Mattias Bingerud

Mikael Enelund

Pages:

Affiliations:

Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

Keywords:

CDIO standard 4

CDIO Standard 5

CDIO Standard 10

CDIO Standard 12

Design-Implement Project

Educational quality

Year:

2018

Reference:

Biggs, J., Tang, C. (2007) Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, 3rd ed, Open University Press.:

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning, Journal of engineering education, 103-120.:

Gosset, W. S. (1908) The probable error of a mean, Biometrika, 6(1): 1–25.:

doi.org/10.1093/biomet/6.1.1.

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning, Journal of engineering education, 103-120, :

doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00832.x.

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., Olkinuora, E. (2006) Project-based learning in post-secondary education – theory, practice and rubber sling shots, Higher education, 51: 287-314, :

doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004- 6386-5.

Hermon, J. P., McCartan, C. D. (2017) Effective undergraduate design-build-test project implementation: The need for a comprehensive checklist of self-evaluation criteria, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.:

Joyce, T., Evans, I., Pallan, W., Hopkins, C. (2013) A hands-on project-based mechanical engineering design module focusing on sustainability, Engineering Education, 8 (1): 65-80, :

doi.org/10.11120/ened.2013.00008.

Kontio, E., Lakanmaa, R.-L. (2016) Design-build experiences – ICU game capstone project, Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland:

Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H. (2010) Student satisfaction and self-efficacy in a cooperative robotics course, Social behavior & personality, 38(8): 1135-1146, :

doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.8.1135.

Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., Kjellberg, M. (2015) A survey of CDIO implementation globally – Effects on educational quality, Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.:

Malmqvist, J., Young, P. W., Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., Svensson, T. (2004) Lessons learned from design-build-test-based student projects, Proceedings of Design 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia.:

Ministry of Education. The Higher Education Ordinance, Annex 2. Stockholm, Sweden, 2007:

Schrey-Niemenmaa, K., Piironen, A. K. (2017) Experiences of the first year introductory project in Metropolia, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.:

Van Torre, P., Verhaevert, J. (2017) A design-implement capstone project in electronics engineering, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.:

Wallin, P., Lyng, R., Sortland, B., Veine, S. (2017) Experts in teamwork - A large scale course for interdisciplinary learning and collaboration, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.:

on January 21, 2019 - 20:46 Tyrone Machado

LESSONS LEARNED FROM STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEYS OF CDIO PROJECT COURSES

Navigation

LESSONS LEARNED FROM STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEYS OF CDIO PROJECT COURSES

Share this content.