LEADING AND COMMUNICATING CHANGE IN AN ENGINEERING FACULTY MERGER

LEADING AND COMMUNICATING CHANGE IN AN ENGINEERING FACULTY MERGER

K. Holopainen, T. Holopainen, J. Kallio-Gerlander, A. Norström, J. Roslöf (2019).  LEADING AND COMMUNICATING CHANGE IN AN ENGINEERING FACULTY MERGER. 15.

Higher education institutions (HEIs) have been exposed to several change drivers during the past few decades. The global expansion of higher education together with the financial cuts in several countries have caused structural and organisational changes on different levels. In addition, the general requirements on the efficiency of public organisations, so-called New Public Management, are connected to the trends of developing the organisations and management policies in HEIs more towards entrepreneurial or corporate cultures. Successful implementation of these change processes challenge the change management and communication skills of the managers and leaders of the institutions. Communication is a vital element of leading a change successfully towards the defined vision. This concerns also the change and development processes facilitated by the CDIO Initiative. Similarly, Turku University of Applied Sciences (TUAS) has undergone a number of changes in the recent years and the change is still ongoing. One of the central elements of the most current change was to merge two faculties to form a new Faculty of Engineering and Business. This case study analyses how this organisational change process of TUAS was actualised and communicated in the internal documentation and presentations during 2016–2018 in relation to the so-called eight-step change management model presented by Kotter (1995/2007). The analysis found elements of the first six steps in the data, however the last two steps need a longer timespan to realise. As a conclusion, it seems that the Kotter model is a viable tool to assess leading change also in the HEI context. 

Authors (New): 
Krista Holopainen
Timo Holopainen
Jaana Kallio-Gerlander
Anne Norström
Janne Roslöf
Pages: 
15
Affiliations: 
University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Keywords: 
Change Management
leading change
organisational change
higher education institution
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2019
Reference: 
Appelbaum, S.H., Habashy, S., Malo, J-L. & Shafiq, H. (2012). Back to the future: revisiting Kotter’s 1996 change model. Journal of Management Development, 31, 8: 
Blaschke, S., Frost, J. & Hattke, F. (2014). Towards a micro foundation of leadership, governance, and management in universities. Higher Education, 68, pp. 711–732.: 
Bleiklie I. (2014). Comparing University Organizations across Boundaries. Higher Education, 67, pp. 381–391.: 
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42, 3, pp. 293–337.: 
Jones, G. (2007). Organizational theory, design and change. Upper Saddle River: PearsonPrentice Hall. : 
ISBN:9780131865426
Kotter, J. (1995/2007) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, January 2007, 96–103. Reprinted from Harvard Business Review, 73, pp. 59–67, 1995.: 
Langstrand, J. & Lundqvist, D. (2015). Att leda förändring från förhandling till realisering. Linköpings universitet.: 
Lanning, H., Roiha, M. & Salminen, A. (1999). Matkaopas muutokseen. Miten kehität organisaatiota tehokkaasti ja hallitusti. Helsinki: Kauppakamari Oyj. : 
ISBN 952-14-0096-X
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.: 
Mainardes, E.W., Alves, H. & Raposo, M. (2011). The Process of Change in University Management: From the “Ivory Tower” to Entrepreneurialism. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 33, pp. 124–149.: 
Nadler, D., Tushman, M. (1990). Beyond the charismatic leader: leadership and organizational change. California Management Review. Winter, 77–97.: 
Pettigrew, A. & Whipp, R. (1991). Managing Change for Competitive Success. Oxford: Blackwell Business: 
Ramirez, F.O. & Tiplic, D. (2014). In pursuit of excellence? Discursive patterns in European higher education research. Higher Education, 67, pp. 439–455.: 
Shepstone, C. & Currie, L. (2013). Organizational Culture and Institutional Change: Prairie West University in Transition. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, pp. 92–94.: 
Turku university of applied Sciences (2019, January). About us. Retrieved January 2019 from: http://www.tuas.fi/en/about-us/tuas/: 
Go to top