The Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) sector is gender biased throughout, in schools, workplaces and academia. The development for gender equality is slow and stereotypes are still male dominated in STEM. The situation is complicated with many influencing factors that have been studied and dealt with for the last decades. To decide what education or training to achieve is among the most important decision in young peoples´ lives. The trend is that more males go for STEM studies while females go for subjects like education, health sciences and social sciences. It is important for engineering as a profession not only to attract both genders, but also to get a better understanding of the influencing factors when young persons are deciding what subject to select for their life. This paper presents an overview of the findings from a study focusing on gender differences in engineering students’ choice of studies and discusses some ideas of what educators can do to change the situation. This topic touches on CDIO Standard 1 (program philosophy), 7 and 8 (new methods of teaching and learning).
Pages:
12
Affiliations:
Reykjavik University, Iceland
Keywords:
STEM
gender differences
Choice of studies
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year:
2018
Reference:
Ashcraft, C., Eger, E., & Friend, M. (2012). Girls in iT: the facts. Retrieved from http://www.bgwomeninict.org/language/bg/uploads/files/documents__0/documents__83629f0d73af0b9 54068af2b53b04dc5.pdf:
Benbow, C. P., & Minor, L. L. (1986). Mathematically Talented Males and Females and Achievement in the High School Sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 425–436. :
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023003425
Brown, P. L., Concannon, J. P., Marx, D., Donaldson, C., & Black, A. (2016). An Examination of Middle School Students’ STEM Self-Efficacy with Relation to Interest and Perceptions of STEM. Journal of STEM Education : Innovations and Research; Auburn, 17(3), 27–38.:
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. (2015a). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015b). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
Cheryan, S., Zieger, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1.:
Eccles, J. S., Arberton, A., Buchanan, C. M., Janis, J., Flanagan, C., Harold, R., Reuman, D. (1993). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. Developmental Perspectives on Motivation, 40, 145–208.:
Ertl, B., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2017). The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703
Funke, A., Berges, M., & Hubwieser, P. (2016). Different Perceptions of Computer Science (pp. 14–18). IEEE. :
https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.1
Hänze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 29–41. :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
Huffman, A. H., Whetten, J., & Huffman, W. H. (2013). Using technology in higher education: The influence of gender roles on technology self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1779–1786. :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.012
Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13–24. :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002
Lapan, R. T., Shaughnessy, P., & Boggs, K. (1996). Efficacy Expectations and Vocational Interests as Mediators between Sex and Choice of Math/Science College Majors: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 277–291. :
https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0044
Lazarides, R., & Ittel, A. (2012). Instructional Quality and Attitudes toward Mathematics: Do Self-Concept and Interest Differ across Students’ Patterns of Perceived Instructional Quality in Mathematics Classrooms? [Research article]. :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/813920
Liben, L. S., & Coyle, E. F. (2014). Chapter three - Developmental Interventions to Address the STEM Gender Gap: Exploring Intended and Unintended Consequences. In L. S. Liben & R. S. Bigler (Eds.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 47, pp. 77–115). JAI. :
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.06.001
Matthiasdottir, A., & Palsdottir, J. (2016). Where are the girls in STEM? Presented at the 6th STS Italia Conference | Sociotechnical Environments, Trento, Italy:
Paino, M., & Renzulli, L. A. (2013). Digital Dimension of Cultural Capital: The (In)Visible Advantages for Students Who Exhibit Computer Skills. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 124–138. :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712456556
Preston, A. E. (1994). Why have all the women gone? A study of exit of women from the science and engineering professions. The American Economic Review, 84(5), 1446–1462.:
Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2013). Friendship Groups, Personal Motivation, and Gender in Relation to High School Students’ STEM Career Interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 652–664. :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12013
Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103–116. :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.001
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. :
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
Schuster, C., & Martiny, S. E. (2017). Not Feeling Good in STEM: Effects of Stereotype Activation and Anticipated Affect on Women’s Career Aspirations. Sex Roles, 76(1–2), 40–55. :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0665-3
Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education, 69, 408–418. :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032
Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. American Psychological Association.:
van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2016). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159–183.:
on January 21, 2019 - 18:46 Tyrone Machado
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
