FACULTY EXPERIENCES IN INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Home » FACULTY EXPERIENCES IN ...

FACULTY EXPERIENCES IN INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

2018 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa IT, Japan
PDF icon 44_Final_PDF.pdf

Changes in the business environment (such as shorter product lifecycles, globalization, and digitalization) while contributing to a sustainable development, have formed new conditions for companies and organizations. In this new situation, problems encountered cannot be answered within a single discipline. Interdisciplinary programs where students from different disciplines interact in learning and knowledge creation is a way to meet these changes in society. An interdisciplinary program also requires interaction on staff level: Meaningful collaboration brings together expertise from different disciplines so the fundamentals of a given discipline are clarified, and the connections to other disciplines are described, reaching a synergy effect by utilizing the strengths of each area. This, however, puts demands on the curriculum design and on the interaction of the teachers. This paper explores the teachers’ perspective of an interdisciplinary program at Linnaeus University. The program is a 2-year master program entitled “Innovation through business, engineering and design”, recruiting students from the engineering, business and design disciplines. The teaching staff represents different subject areas, and the teachers interact in an interdisciplinary mode in the first year, while the second year mainly contains disciplinary courses. In two focus group interviews, teachers were asked about opportunities and challenges in participating in the interdisciplinary program, as well as their view and how interdisciplinarity is considered in the program. The purpose of the paper is to identify how teachers perceive teaching in an interdisciplinary program as well as to distinguish perceived opportunities and challenges for teachers to participate in interdisciplinary programs. This paper concludes that teachers perceive interdisciplinary learning to take place in the project context, where students come from different disciplines work together to solve a complex real-life assignment. Moreover, the hindrances appear to outweigh the possibilities in participating in an interdisciplinary program. Amongst challenges the teachers perceive lack of resources, such as appropriate learning environments, required competence, and unclear decision channels. 

Authors (New): 
Åsa Gustafsson
Mirka Kans
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Linnaeus University, Sweden
Keywords: 
interdisciplinary
Focus groups
Innovation
Mastr Program
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 73-83.: 
Boden, D, Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741–755.: 
Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T. E. (2014). Nya perspektiv på organisation och ledarskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.: 
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2013). Business research methods (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.: 
Davies, M., & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education: Implications for teaching and learning. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, the University of Melbourne. [Electronic document], http://cshe.unimelb.edu.au/resources_teach/curriculum_design/docs/InterdisciplinaryHEd.pdf. : 
Duffield, S., Olson, A., & Kerzman, R. (2013). Crossing Borders, Breaking Boundaries: Collaboration Among Higher Education Institutions. Innovations in Higher Education, 38, 237–250.: 
Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991). The group interview in social research. The Social Science Journal, 28(2), 175-188.: 
Gustafsson, Å. (2015). Beyond reasoning: Pitfalls when developing an interdisciplinary program. Lärarlärdom, Växjö, Sweden.: 
Holley, K. A. (2015). Doctoral education and the development of an interdisciplinary identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 642-652.: 
Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty Members' Morale and Their Intention to Leave: A Multilevel Explanation. Journal of higher Education, 73(4), 518- 542.: 
Kans, M. & Gustavsson, Å. (2016). Analyzing the meaning of interdisciplinary in the CDIO context. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016.: 
Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic Duty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.: 
Meeth R. (1978). Interdisciplinary Studies: A Matter of Definition. Change 10(7), 10: 
O’Meara, K., Rivera, M., Kuvaeva, A., & Corrigan, K. (2017). Faculty Learning Matters: Organizational Conditions and Contexts that Shape Faculty Learning. Innovative Higher Education, 42(4), 355-376.: 
Pharo, E. J., Davison, A., Warr, K., Nursey-Bray, M., Beswick, K., Wapstra, E., & Jones, C. (2012). Can teacher collaboration overcome barriers to interdisciplinary learning in a disciplinary university? A case study using climate change, Teaching in Higher Education, 17(5), 497-507.: 
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture, Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187-195.: 
Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., & Rizzo, A. (2005). Interdisciplinarity: An emergent or engineered process? In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.). Interdisciplinary collaboration. Mahwah. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. : 
Ryser, L., Halseth, G., & Thien, D. (2009). Strategies and Intervening Factors Influencing Student Social Interaction and Experiential Learning in an Interdisciplinary Research Team. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 248-267.: 
Sá, C. M. (2008). ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities, Higher Education, 55(5), 537–552.: 
Schmidt, A. H., Robbins, A. S. T., Combs, J. K., Freeburg, A., Jesperson, R. G., Rogers, H. S., Sheldon, K. S., & Wheat, E. (2012). A New Model for Training Graduate Students to Conduct Interdisciplinary, Interorganizational, and International Research, BioScience, 62(3), 296–304.: 
Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. Journal of advanced Nursing, 28(2), 345-352. : 
Townsend, T., Pisapia, J., & Razzaq, J. (2013). Fostering interdisciplinary research in universities: a case study of leadership, alignment and support. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 658-675.: 
Turner, V. K., Benessaiah, K., Warren, S., & Iwaniec, D. (2015). Essential tensions in interdisciplinary scholarship: navigating challenges in affect, epistemologies, and structure in environment–society research centers, Higher Education, 70(4), 649-665.: 
on January 21, 2019 - 16:29   Tyrone Machado
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top