ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ INTERACTION WITH INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES

ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ INTERACTION WITH INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES

M. Berglund, P. Cronemyr, M. Smeds, P. Wangwacharakul (2022).  ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ INTERACTION WITH INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES. 338-348.

The aim of this paper is to share and reflect on experiences of learning activities, in which engineering students meet with representatives from industry and public organisations to get acquainted with realistic engineering issues. The paper is based on experiences from two learning activities at Linköping University, which aim at making the engineering students familiar with realistic industrial issues. The first activity is a course in Lean production, in which a half-day conference is organised where representatives from industry and public organisations describe how they work with Lean in practice. The second consists of courses in Six Sigma, in which the students carry out Six Sigma and Quality Management projects in different companies. Data regarding the students’ experiences, learning and opinion about interaction with industrial and public sector representatives during their education were collected through questionnaires and interviews. The industrial representatives’ views were similarly collected through interviews and written evaluations. The findings are that the learning activities were highly appreciated. They gave a good picture of real working-life issues and were relevant to the students. In the Six Sigma projects, the students specifically described that they learnt a great deal, both about Six Sigma and about project management, how to describe their work in new ways, and how to solve practical issues. The industrial representatives expressed that they were satisfied with the students’ work, their competence, and the final result. It was beneficial that the students looked at the company problems from an outside perspective and that they contributed to knowledge sharing within the company. Experiences of organising these learning activities include highly positive feedbacks from students and participating organisations. For the teachers, even though it implies a lot of work, it is also a very positive experience contributing individual insights and life-long learning.

Authors (New): 
Martina Berglund
Peter Cronemyr
Magdalena Smeds
Promporn Wangwacharakul
Pages: 
338-348
Affiliations: 
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Keywords: 
Active learning
Real-world engineering issues
Quality Management
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
Biggs, J. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching, Higher Education Research and Development, 8(1), 7-25.: 
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with modeleliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 161–163.: 
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6684807
CDIO (2021). CDIO Standards 3.0, http://www.cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30 (Retrieved Dec.28, 2021).: 
Hmelo, C.E. & Ferrari, M. (1997). The problem-based learning tutorial: Cultivating higher order thinking skills, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, (20, 4), 401–422.: 
Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On Qualitative differences in learning: I – Outcome and process, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.: 
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.: 
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research, Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3) 2004, 223–231.: 
Zhu, J., Liu, R., Liu, Q, Zheng, T. & Zhang, Z. (2019). Engineering Students’ Epistemological Thinking in the Context of Project-Based Learning, IEEE Transactions in Education, 62(3), 188-198.: 
Go to top
randomness