ALIGNMENT AND MAPPING BETWEEN CDIO STANDARDS AND AUN-QA CRITERIA

ALIGNMENT AND MAPPING BETWEEN CDIO STANDARDS AND AUN-QA CRITERIA

T. Van Pham, A. Nguyen, H. Nguyen, M. Phan, T. Chuan (2020).  ALIGNMENT AND MAPPING BETWEEN CDIO STANDARDS AND AUN-QA CRITERIA. Volume 1, pp.77-90.

The ASEAN University Network-Quality Assurance (AUN-QA) Network, which was initiated since 1998, aims to develop a holistic quality assurance system to raise academic standards and enhance education, research and service among its member universities through the use of its policy and criteria. In rising to the challenges of the ASEAN Community, the AUN-QA Network has to be looking forward to advocating a harmonized framework for quality assurance in higher education within and outside ASEAN. There are 11 criteria which have been developed in the 3rd version of the AUN-QA model for programme level covering three dimensions on quality of input, quality of process and quality of output. This paper will present research and practice on alignment and mapping from CDIO standards as quality toolkits to meet the AUN-QA criteria in the view of outcome-based education (OBE) approach. First, the study outlines an in-depth literature review on the comparison between the AUN-QA criteria and the CDIO standards. Next, the mapping details of the AUN-QA criteria and the CDIO standards according to their alignment are presented. Third, the paper presents the CDIO implementation by The University of Danang - University of Science and Technology (UD-DUT) to fulfil aligned requirements of the AUN-QA assessment at the program level. It is concluded that the implementation of the CDIO framework has demonstrated a positive accelerating OBE implementation and, thus, to meet the AUN-QA expectation. Exploitation of CDIO standards implementation has reformed the UD-DUT educational system to leverage remarkably multi-dimensional quality of the university quality assurance system and study programs. A selected set of good practices on CDIO implementation are recommended for further discussion and possibly usage by the AUN-QA community for AUN-QA assessment effectiveness.

Authors (New): 
Tuan Van Pham
Anh Thu Nguyen
Hong Hai Nguyen
Minh Duc Phan
Tan Kay Chuan
Pages: 
Volume 1, pp.77-90
Affiliations: 
The University of Danang, Vietnam
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Keywords: 
Outcome-Based Education
AUN-QA
Quality Assurance
quality assessment
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Aburatani, H. (2019). Comparison between NIT Kosen curriculum and CDIO standards and syllabus. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25-27, 2019.: 
ASEAN, (2013). ASEAN Quality Assurance Framework. https://www.share-asean.eu/sites/default/files/AQAF.pdf: 
ASEAN (2015). ASEAN Economic community blueprint 2025. ASEAN Secretariat, November 2015. https://www.asean.org/storage/2016/03/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf: 
AUN, (2015). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level Version 3.0. ASEAN University Network, Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.aunsec.org/publications.php: 
AUN, (2016). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Institutional Level Version 2.0. ASEAN University Network, Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.aunsec.org/publications.php: 
Bennedsen, J., Georgsson, F. & Kontio, J. (2014). Evaluating the CDIO Self-Evaluation. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19, 2014: 
Cheah, S., Koh, C., & Huiting, C. (2013). Using CDIO Self-Evaluation for Quality Assurance and Accreditation. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, June 9-13, 2013.: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Lucas W. A. & Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 - An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education. CDIO Knowledge Library. Cambridge, MA; Worldwide CDIO Initiative. http://www.cdio.org. : 
DUT, (2016). TF-SP CDIO Project at UD-DUT. The University of Danang - University of Science and Technology http://www.udn.vn/en_posts/view/166, http://dut.udn.vn/EN/News/id/1124: 
Enelund, M & Bankel, J. (2008). The Mechanical Engineering Programme at Chalmers University of Technology – Application for appointment as Centre of Excellent Quality in Higher Education, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 2008.: 
ENAEE (European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education), (2015). EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes, https://www.enaee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/EUR-ACE-Framework-Standards-and-Guidelines-Mar-2015.pdf : 
EURASHE (European Association of Institutions in Higher Education) (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG), Brussels, Belgium, 2015. https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf: 
Gray, P. (2011). CDIO Standards & Quality Assurance: From Application to Accreditation. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, June 20-23, 2011.: 
Gunnarsson, S., Herbertsson, H. & Örman H. (2019). Using course and program matrices as components in a quality assurance system. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25-27, 2019. : 
Lee, L., Chong H.L., (2017). TF-SP CDIO Project at UD-DUT Report. Singapore Polytechnic International. 2017: 
Lee, L., Lee, L., Sripakagorn, A., Kuptasthien, N., Tien, D., Saad, N., Cheah, S-M. & Leong, H. (2015). Comparative study on CDIO implementation in selected ASEAN countries. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, June 8-11, 2015.: 
Malmqvist, J. (2009). A comparison of the CDIO and EUR-ACE quality assurance systems. Proceedings of the 05th International CDIO Conference, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore, June 7-10, 2009.: 
Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R. & Kjellberg M. (2015). A survey of CDIO implementation globally – effects on educational quality, barriers to implementation, and factors leading to success. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, June 8-11, 2015: 
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) (2015). The Baldrige Excellence Framework (Education). https://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/baldrige-excellence-framework/education: 
Pham T. V., Ta, H. T. T. & Nguyen H. T. T. (2019). Digital Innovation and Impact on Quality Assurance. Quality Assurance in Vietnamese Higher Education: Policy and Practice in the 21st Century, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 213-239: 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26859-6
SPI (Singapore Polytechnic International) (2015). Learning Express Overview. Singapore Polytechnic International. https://www.spi.edu.sg/programmes/global-learning-programme-overview/learning-express/, http://www.udn.vn/en_posts/view/338, http://dut.udn.vn/EN/News/id/1735: 
UNESCO, (2003). Higher education in Asia and the Pacific, 1998-2003. Regional report on progress in implementing recommendations of the 1998 World Conference on Higher Education. Second session of the Regional Follow-up Committee, Bangkok, Thailand, February 25-26, 2003.: 
UN (United Nations), (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/: 
Wah C., Tan, D., Chong, J. & Wee, K. (2015). CDIO and ABET accreditation – The Nanyang Polytechnic Experience. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, June 8-11, 2015.: 
Go to top
randomness