ACTIVE LEARNING IN LARGE INTRODUCTORY CLASSES IN MATHEMATIC

ACTIVE LEARNING IN LARGE INTRODUCTORY CLASSES IN MATHEMATIC

E. Ferreira, C. Lobo (2009).  ACTIVE LEARNING IN LARGE INTRODUCTORY CLASSES IN MATHEMATIC. 13.

The teaching-learning process has been a constant target of studies, particularly in Higher Education, in consequence of the annual increase of new students. The concern with the maintenance of a certain quality level in the training of these students, conjugated with the will to widen the access to all of those who finish Secondary School Education, has triggered a greater intervention from the education specialists, in partnership with the teachers of all Higher Education areas, in the problem analysis.

Considering the particular case of Sciences and Engineering, it is witnessed a rising concern with the active learning strategies and forms of assessment. Research has demonstrated that students learn more if they are actively engaged with the material they are studying. In this presentation we describe and present the results of an active learning strategy in an Algebra course of the Informatics’ Engineering Bach., with nearly 430 students and a team of 5 teachers.

The students start to study a subject with some help from the teachers, and they have to prepare a presentation on the studied subject. They make the presentation to their colleagues and after that they are evaluated. During this year we notice that students have shown a deeper interest in Algebra classes and also improving overall results. This paper helps us answer the following questions: Who evaluates the presentations? How is this done? What other forms of assessment are there in this subject? What was used to assess that students showed deeper interest? 

Authors (New): 
Eduarda Pinto Ferreira
Cristina Costa Lobo
Pages: 
13
Affiliations: 
Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto (ISEP), Portugal
Keywords: 
Teaching-learning process
Learning strategies
Assessment
Year: 
2009
Reference: 
Feisel, L. D. & Peterson, G. D. (2002). A Colloquy on Learning Objectives for Engineering Education Laboratories. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Taken from http://www.abet.org/Linked%20DocumentsUPDATE/White%20Papers/Laboratory%20Learning%20Objectives.pdf on December 26th , 2007.: 
Jaques, P. A., Bercht, M., Bocca, E. & Viccari, R. (2003). Cognitive Reasoning to Respond Affectively to the Student. Artigo apresentado na IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Taken from http://www.inf.unisinos.br/~pjaques/trabalhos on January 28th, 2008.: 
Lesser, V., Ortiz Jr., C. L. & Tambe, M. (2003). Introduction to a Multiagent Perspective. In G. Weiss (Series Ed.) & V. Lesser, C. L. Ortiz Jr. & M. Tambe (Vol. Eds.), Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations: Vol. 9. Distributed Sensor Networks: A Multiagent Perspective (1ª ed., pp. 13-14). United Kingdom: Kluwer Academic Publishers.: 
Levine, T., Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 125-46.: 
Peters, O. (2001). Didática do Ensino à Distância. Experiências e estágio da discussão numa visão internacional. Rio Grande do Sul: Editora Unisinos.: 
Mager, R. F. (1976). Atitudes favoráveis ao ensino (José Darcy C. Rodrigues, trad.). Porto Alegre: Globo. (Originally published in 1976).: 
Lopes, J. B. (2004). Aprender e Ensinar Física. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian & Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia: 
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall: 
Bencomo, S. D. (2004). Control learning: present and future. Annual Reviews in Control. 28(1), 115-136.: 
Jinks, R. (1994). Developing experimental skills in engineering undergraduates. Engineering Science and Education Journal, 3(6), 287-290.: 
Leite, L. (2001). Caetano, H. V. & Santos, M. G. Santos (org.). Contributos para uma utilização mais fundamentada do trabalho laboratorial no ensino das ciências. Cadernos Didácticos de Ciências, 1. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.: 
Ma, J. and Nickerson, J. V. (2006, Setembro). Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), Artigo 7. Taken from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1132960.1132961 on December 26th, 2007: 
Nickerson, J. V., Corterb, J. E., Esche, S. K., & Chassapis, C. (2007). A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education. Computers & Education, 49(3), 708-725.: 
Wasserstein, J. (2005). Learning and teaching with new technologies - from innovation to impact. In A. Gaskell & A. Tait (Eds.), The 11th Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning (pp. 219-225). Cambridge: The Open University.: 
Daniel Spooner, "Analyse et évaluation des cahiers de projets", Ecole Polytechnique Montreal 26 septembre 2007: 
McAlpine, H., Hicks, B.J., Huet, G., Culley, S.J., An investigation into the use and content of the engineer’s notebook, Elsevier, Design Studies, Vol. 27, No.4, Julho 2006: 
Paul, R., Niewoehner, R., Elder, L., Engineering Reasoning, Foundation for critical thinking, 2006, 56 p.: 
ISBN 0-944583-33-4
Go to top
randomness